Logo-apb

Submitted: 07 Jun 2025
Revision: 16 Nov 2025
Accepted: 23 Mar 2026
ePublished: 09 May 2026
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Adv Pharm Bull. Inpress.
doi: 10.34172/apb.45925
  Abstract View: 20

Research Article

PpSP42 and LmSTI1-PpSP42 Recombinant Proteins from Phlebotomus papatasi and Leishmania major Confer Protection against Leishmania major Infection in BALB/c mice

Fariborz Bahrami ORCID logo, Touraj Miandoabi ORCID logo, Vahideh Moein Vaziri ORCID logo, Farhad Riazi-Rad ORCID logo, Soheila Ajdary* ORCID logo
*Corresponding Author: Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Purpose: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), a parasitic skin disease transmitted by sand flies, is characterized by complex interactions between Leishmania parasites and sand fly saliva, influencing both transmission and disease progression. This study investigated the immunogenicity of partial Phlebotomus papatasi salivary protein PpSP42 (or PP42 in short) and a novel recombinant fusion protein composed of Leishmania major stress-inducible protein 1 (LmSTI1) and PP42, produced in Escherichia coli. Methods: BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously with the fusion protein or with PP42 subunits separately, using resiquimod as an adjuvant, and subsequently challenged with L. major promastigotes and sand fly salivary gland homogenate. Lesion development and parasite burden as well immune responses were evaluated by measuring key cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10, TNF-α) and antibodies (IgG, IgG1, IgG2a) up to eight weeks post-challenge. Results: Immunization with either PP42 or the fusion protein significantly attenuated lesion development (30-40% reduction in lesion size after 8 weeks; P < 0.001) and parasite burden (∼100-fold lower after 8 weeks; P < 0.05) compared to the PBS control. This protection was accompanied by significantly higher levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α (P < 0.05 for both). Also, an elevated IgG2a/IgG1 ratio (P < 0.01), indicative of a Th1-biased immune response was observed when the fusion protein was used for immunization. Conclusion: These findings suggest while immunization with PP42 protein alone resulted in lesion control and reduced parasite load, compared to the control group, these effects were less pronounced than those observed in the fusion protein group. Hence, LmSTI1-PP42 fusion protein warrants further investigation as a potential vaccine candidate against L. major infection.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 18

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.